Thursday, 27 November 2014

Teach Anyway...

As time ticks on, and another fall semester comes to an end, university students are quickly reminded that Christmas break is but the calm after the storm. Presentations, papers and exams will consume university student lives for the next few weeks, alongside eating large (or small) quantities of food, pulling all-nighters, and mental breaks. Then, the calm will come. Students will head home to celebrate the holidays alongside their families and friends. Eventually, students will return to school in January to then prepare themselves, once again, for a similar April demise they met just a few short months ago.
Source: http://www.thecommissioningelf.net
/we-should-work-jointly-with-communities-
to-improve-our-nhs-together-says-guide/
            Traditional methods of schooling, and grades-based approaches to teaching, create a cycle of need. Students and teachers become so overwhelmed and stressed in their attempts to succeed in this cycle that they eventually breakdown. Yet, throughout the breakdown, they recognize the world operates using this system, and this system only. So, they wallow in sorrow for a moment or two, and then return to the source that caused them so much distress before. And why? In order become, what society calls “successful”. Because, in traditional schooling practices, success is measured only by grade obtainment, a cycle of need is formed. Students intrinsically motivated to be successful fail to recognize they have the power to be successful in other ways. Recognize I said a cycle of need, not a cycle of want. Students and educators today, don’t want to be involved in the system. Current teachers talk to reporters and administrators of their desires to alter their practice, prospective teachers sit in university classrooms and propose ideas to each other they believe will revolutionize education in the future, and students, students often fail even to enter the classroom because their feelings of disconnect and despair are so strong. They don’t want to be in school, but they need it. They need it to be “successful”.
            This class has taught me that transforming education from a cycle of need to a cycle of want begins with the teacher making the curriculum relevant to my students. As the interpreter of the curriculum documents it is my responsibility to design educational tasks that will inspire life-long learners to want to return to my classroom everyday. This class has allowed me the opportunity to practice the skill set I will need to use to accomplish this goal. And, while the skill set was difficult to use at first, the more I practiced, the more I saw my skills developing. New and unfamiliar strategies of design were difficult to be passionate about but by being gritty I was able to accomplish something I barely saw possible, and created something I now consider meaningful. Five weeks ago, I never thought my curriculum document would ever be complete. Now, it’s practically done, days, weeks, in advance of its due date. Over time, I recognized that I wanted to be putting the document together; I wanted to learn to do something new; I wanted to be successful.
            By engaging with the course theory in a practical way through the group curriculum project, not only have I become a grittier student, but I have become a grittier teacher as well. This assignment is preparing me to be a practicing teacher – it is allowing me to develop the skills I need to be successful instead of testing me on my knowledge of such a skill set, and it is teaching me to be gritty about my practice. My realization about the importance of “grit” will impact my future teaching practice because it will allow me to achieve things I never thought possible. It will allow me to tackle difficult tasks head on, with confidence and pride that all goals are attainable. Finally, it teaches me that I can do anything.
Source: http://www.eco-coach.com
/blog/2013/06/07/creating-change-
when-youre-not-in-charge-part-ii-of-ii/
The thing is, we don’t have to do anything. Everything each of us chooses to do is a conscious decision we make as an individual and is indicative of the consequences or rewards we seek to avoid or achieve, respectively. For instance, I didn’t have to practice backward design in this class. As a group, my colleagues and I easily could have reverted to traditional practices and designed our curriculum beginning with instructional tasks, developing culminating activities next, and concluding our project with the design of assessment tools. We could’ve just arranged these items in reverse order prior to handing them in and called it a day, labeling our final project as a backwards design construct. But, we chose differently. We chose, instead, to be brave, to be gritty. We dove head first into the backwards design process and while we met many obstacles, we climbed so many more mountains and found so many more rewards! If I’m going to sit in a classroom and talk about the idea of revolutionizing education, and being successful in living a life, not making one, I need to be brave enough to attempt to accomplish that myself. Now, I can say I’ve done that. Eventually, my actions will spread. Others will jump on board as they see the passion and grit developing in my (future) classrooms, and a revolution will begin. A cycle of want will result in education and success will be measured differently.
            Now motivated and properly prepared, I think I am ready to advance to step two in my father’s plan for me, the one I dreaded and feared and worried about in so many posts before. It’s time for me to go out into the world, with all of the knowledge and skills I have gained, and work towards my goal not of getting a job and building a life, but of living my life, as a teacher. This class has shown me I'm going to encounter politics, and curricula and even students I don't like. But it's also shown me that I am destined to do this, to be someone's champion.  I think that now, I'm gritty enough to face them. I'm ready to face these challenges. It's time to teach, anyway.  


“I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something that I can do.” – Helen Keller


Monday, 27 October 2014

Get Ready to Get Gritty


Source: http://timemanagementninja.com/
2012/07/how-to-tie-up-the-loose-
ends-of-your-productivity/
As I look back on the past few weeks I realize that time has flown by in EDUC 4P19. It’s not even November and already I have read an entire book about integrating curriculum via backwards design! I have learned about the new story, and how it differs from the old. I have studied the backwards design process and critically analyzed many of its intricacies. I’ve even come to recognize the implications of the grading culture on teacher practice and well-being. However, as I read through my previous blogs, I realize I’ve left some ends untied… 

Did anything I read resonate with my opinion that the “Be” should be left up to the students to decide?
I don’t think so... I don’t really know when or how I came up with that idea. I’ve never even thought about "who" should determine "what" in curriculum design before this class – I always just assumed the ministry would take care of it all. I think that the opinion developed because this class has given me an opportunity to critically assess the education system in its current and potential states. In so many classes I am asked to scrutinize and analyze, and to create new ideas, to revolutionize education, but so often too are these ideas penalized for sake of not being what the instructor believes in, or not what the instructor is “looking for” in a particular answer. This class, in its fundamental design, allows for free self-exploration and expression. The holistic grading approach, allows me to consider ideas such at that above without fear of hostility. Therefore, I guess all of my readings kind of lead me to developing the idea. I ask why not leave it to the kids to decide? If integrated education via backwards design means students’ daily learning is based on specific knowing and doing outcomes from the curriculum, I guess its just a personal belief of mine that since “Be” items aren’t explicitly stated in the curriculum that students should have the freedom to choose who they will become throughout the learning process. Furthermore, in life, I don’t believe anyone has the right to determine the “Be” for anyone but him or her self.

Source: http://activemartialartsgonzales.com/blog/
Why do I think the idea of completing work that associates to real-life situations connects to the “Do” and the “Be” we have been discussing in the curriculum, or to project-based learning?
Project-based learning allows students to “Do” and “Be” in order to create the “Know” for themselves. In traditional education, or old story education, students were seen as empty vessels ready to be filled with knowledge and little effort was required on their part in gaining it. Now however, students are viewed as more than a mind in a body, and it is recognized that their entire human form must be involved in learning for it to be most rewarding. Therefore, students must “Do” and “Be” via exploration or project-based learning in order to truly gain any form of “Know”-ing. Further, real-life relevance embeds student learning in relatable situations, fostering higher-level thinking and learning. This learning is remembered better and longer than surface learning.

How might the competitive aspect of traditional schooling be diminished through project-based or inquiry-based learning approaches?
Project-based and inquiry-based learning approaches have been depict in this course and this blog as the centre of backward design curricula. The backward design process is also rooted in continual feedback being given to students and holistic grading approaches being used. Therefore, by continually dialoguing with students regarding their exploratory learning (in project-based and inquiry-based activities), grading can be more easily based on individual improvement and effort and less on individual achievement. This shift of attention reduces the competitive aspect of traditional schooling as it asks children to foster a growth mindset, praising and rewarding their effort not their IQ, thus diminishing competition between individuals.

Looking at my previous posts and the loose ends I just discussed, holistically, I think I have really allowed myself to wrestle with the course content and bring everything I’ve learned together. I have been critical of the ideas we have discussed in class, and after deep analysis have been able to recognize the benefits and drawbacks of the subject matter. Simultaneously, I've personalized the information being presented to me (by interpreting it within my own experiences and values) through this blog.

Source: http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-images-
frustration-d-human-one-missing-puzzle-
piece-image34918314
However, as I work to develop my group curriculum, I have never felt as though my devotion to learning has been challenged so strongly. Even as we began the preliminary steps of the backward design process I found myself uncomfortable, and not knowing where to go, or what to do next. I had studied the process in depth, and knew the benefits an integrative curriculum presented, yet I was uneasy and anxious when asked to convert theory to practice.

As we have discussed as a blog group before, so often in teacher education we spend hours of our class time studying theory, but too in often do we actually practice what we’ve preached. As I’ve said before, this is the first class I have encountered that has asked me to put my learning into action, and while I thought it would be exciting and fun, it’s honestly been quite frustrating to start.

I’m starting to really consider that maybe this is the point 4P19 seeks to convey: that frustration and struggle produce grander, longer-lasting learners; gritty learners. But, I’ve never had to navigate myself through an uncharted educational path like this before so I’m wondering how, in this success for all design of 4P19, I’m set up for success in this situation. I’m not using that as an excuse to give up, oh no! I offer this statement as a declaration. A declaration that I, and all other prospective teachers in this class, need to be dedicated to, as Angela Lee Duckworth (2013) said in her TEDTalk: The key to success? Grit, "[being] gritty about getting our kids grittier!"



References

Duckworth, A. L. [TED]. (2013, May 9). Angela Lee Duckworth: The key to success? Grit [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H14bBuluwB8


Thursday, 9 October 2014

Backward design with teachers in mind...


Source: http://healthsciencedegree.info/
mental-health-awareness-ribbon-color/
Moving through the school system isn’t as stress-free as everyone thinks when ideas and concepts make sense to you easily. Acing numerous tests and excelling academically isn’t always beneficial to your “social status” when teachers praise you over your peers, daily. I should know; I experienced it. It wasn’t a skill I asked for, but by the time I was 12 I was depressed because of it. I was made fun of at school – called a nerd and a show off for being gifted academically. Eventually, my depression led to increased angry outbursts and extreme self-esteem issues which negatively impacted my extra-curricular activities and relationships. Luckily for me my battle never led to self-harm or self-harming thoughts, but it did lead to me not only being bullied, but becoming one. As time went on I eventually came to recognize the impact of my words and expressions, and the basis of my emotions, and was able to cope with and apply my energy and feelings in a positive way. While my struggles continued for many years, my social status began to improve, though the opinions of 13 year-old me never disappeared fully. However, I got by… until my first year of university. In my first year of university I began suffering from panic attacks. They were debilitating; they were terrifying; and they were worst of all unfamiliar. I knew no one suffering from anything similar, I’d never heard of them before, and I felt like I had no where to go. My battle against mental health culminated in counselling sessions and lifestyle changes. Looking back now, I recognize my mental health issues stemmed, in many respects, from pressure.
When I think about the profession I am about to enter, and I think about the mountains to climb that await me, and I consider my anxious history, I have to wonder how I and others like me will cope with the pressure and expectations that come along with the career of "teacher". Where do teachers have to turn when they feel overwhelmed, scared, or anxious? Why do teachers feel these emotions, especially early on? Can these feelings be prevented? In teacher education we tend to focus on discussing our students’ well being, but as I’ve questioned before, can we really focus on that if we fail to focus on our own? My last post concluded that there is a need to develop strong people, now, I feel like I need to apply that to developing strong teachers. Throughout my university years I have spent so much time developing myself as a person, mentally, but I really haven’t spent much time developing myself as an educator, professionally.
Last week in our blog group a thoughtful conversation developed regarding the concurrent education program as a whole. The program was designed to prepare prospective teachers for the profession that awaits them; it was designed to make sure they were “a step ahead” when they entered teachers college. The unfortunate truth is, it really hasn’t. In concurrent education, I find we spend more time analyzing situations than we do dealing with situations – and while analysis has its uses, practice is more applicable. This is the first class I have ever taken that has allowed me to directly practice skills I will need to execute year-to-year in my profession. This class serves to ensure I am ready to meet the challenges ahead of me, and it therefore reduces my anxieties of the future.
The backward curriculum design process we are performing in class, is based on the premise that assessment, instruction and curriculum need to be directly aligned, and in that order (Drake, Reid & Kolohon, 2014). I need to know my students and curriculum first (Drake et al., 2014). Then, after choosing relevant topics for units, scanning and clustering common curriculum outcomes together, and deconstructing KDB components, I must create rich performance assessment tasks – for students to complete thus demonstrating their understanding of the KDB components explored (Drake et al., 2014). Finally, I must design instructional tasks, or everyday activities, that my students will complete in order to learn the KDB components I've chosen to teach (Drake et al., 2014). While instructional tasks are being delivered I need to simultaneously practice assessment for and as learning – since by providing students with consistent, rich feedback their learning experience is elevated (Drake et al., 2014). This entire process of developing a backward design curriculum is practiced in a classroom setting in which I receive consistent, rich feedback myself, aiding me in developing my curriculum and my practice, and in comprehending my misunderstandings.
I believe that all prospective teachers should experience assessment for and as learning in their teacher education programs in order to not only reduce their in-university stress levels, but also to reduce their “beginning years” anxieties. If an entire course can be based on the premise that designing curriculum around consistent, rich feedback is most beneficial for improving student learning and minimizing anxiety, shouldn’t prospective teachers (university students) have their educational experience directed by these concepts too?
Source: http://www.commondreams.org/views/2013/05
/10/bill-gatess-5-biillion-plan-videotape-americas-teachers
Bill Gates (2013) gave a speech entitled Teachers need real feedback. In his speech, he outlined how all individuals need a coach to give feedback for improvement, and states that teachers receive very little communication of this form while practicing teaching (Gates, 2013). Thinking about my pre-educational experiences I can not agree more with Gates. Not one class I have taken in university has presented me with feedback regarding my teaching techniques/skills, until this one! If assessment of and assessment as learning provide worry free environments for students, in which they feel safe to make mistakes and learn by exploration, similar assessments of teachers would make them feel similarly while building their practice, wouldn’t it? If we use backwards design in order to plan teacher education classes, I believe prospective teachers will feel more comfortable learning about the profession of teaching, and implementing this, now familiar, method of curriculum creation in their classrooms, and will subsequently feel less anxious while learning, and eventually teaching. 

References

Drake, S. M., Reid, J. L., and Kolohon, W. (2014). Interweaving curriculum and classroom assessment: Engaging the 21st-century learner. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Gates, B. [TED]. (2013, May 8). Bill Gates – Teachers need real feedback [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81Ub0SMxZQo

Sunday, 21 September 2014

My fear is a product of my education…

Last night I was up until 1AM watching videos, and trying to understand the new story from varying perspectives – not just the perspectives of the authors of our course textbook. I really wanted to know what the new story meant to many, not what it was to a few… While I was searching around YouTube I stumbled upon a very interesting speech given by Sir Ken Robinson (2011) entitled Educating the Heart and Mind. In this academic talk he gave, Robinson offered that schools were conforming institutions; that they directly created a lost generation – a cognitively weak generation - in which almost half of all people don't know who they are or what they want to do with their life, simply because their education never asked them to explore these areas (Robinson, 2011).

Sir Ken Robinson

Source: http://www.emprendedoresnews.com/
liderazgo/5-preguntas-a-ken-robinson.html
Robinson called this lost generation “the human climate crisis” and he said three interventions would work to diminish it (Robinson, 2011):
1)    Personalizing Education: Robinson noted that remedial school programs are based on the notions of personalized curriculum, strong teacher-student relationships, and group work (a holistic approach). He offers that perhaps the alternative (mainstream schooling) is the program that is actually doing education wrong.
2)    Recognizing humans are embodied not minds in a head: Robinson suggested that our current education system is based on enlightenment thinking – the separation of feeling and intellect – and noted that in life there are two worlds (1) the world that exists whether or not we exist, and (2) the world that exists only because we exist. He said that schools have focused so much on the first world they have completely disregarded the second. He proposes a focus on the arts as a means to reverse this – suggesting that the arts more often than the sciences are focused on understanding our personal worlds and how they relate to the external, whereas sciences focus on the opposite. He suggests we learn content through the arts.
3)    Mindfulness: Robinson claimed mindlessness is one of the greatest downfalls of education. He claims schools have more freedom than they care to explore (i.e. no government document outlines 40 minute periods or separate subject departments). We accept these ideologies because they are “the way it is”. We need to be willing to be mindful of the decisions we make as educators.

Keeping these ideas in mind, I’d like to bring to your attention the title of this blog post: “My fear is a product of my education…” Growing up in the education system that I did, I have succumb to the downfall Robinson discussed. I don’t know who I am, or what to do with my life. I am cognitively weak and am therefore so focused on pleasing others that I can’t think in the way I need to in order to make decisions regarding my teaching style for me. I feel like those words are voodoo in education, “for me”. As if doing something for yourself absolves any inkling of care for others – but how can I ensure the needs of others are met if I can’t even meet my own? Thinking about the discovery-based, self-assessment driven teacher’s I had (whom I mentioned in my last post) I have come to remember that those learning environments felt safe, that students not only participated but were engaged in their participation, and mistakes weren’t just ok to make, they were recommended, encouraged even. I think this ties in with what we have been discussing in class and Sir Ken Robinson's speech – integrating curriculum and fostering a “no grades” learning environment where exploration and knowing one’s self are valued above rote memorization and regurgitation of content knowledge, provides deeper learning that not only lasts longer, but is more beneficial to the growth of the soul.

Our Course Textbook - Interweaving Curriculum
and Classroom Assessment

Source: http://www.amazon.ca/Interweaving-
Curriculum-Classroom-Assessment-21st-
Century/dp/0195447484
When we think about the KDB framework the new story uses, to compose curriculum/assessment/instruction weaves, metacognitive knowledge is mandated content (Drake, Reid, and Kolohon, 2014) – a mandated “know”. When we think about big ideas and enduring understandings that this framework is based upon, concepts are labeled "contestable, the selection of conceptual understanding makes some aspects of the social world more important at the same time as it makes other aspects less important, concepts are [described as] value laden, and concepts are contextual [meaning] they mean different things, in different contexts" (Drake, Reid, and Kolohon, 2014) – again, more mandated “knows”. Perhaps then, I suggest we could use these ideas in order to build a curriculum structured around the essential question: what does it mean to be alive? Science is linked to this, history is linked to this, literary works are linked to this, music and drama and self-expression are linked to this question. What if we could create an entire learning world that explored being alive…  

When we think about the 21st century skills students today need to be able to “do” creativity, innovation, critical thinking, collaboration, communication, character building, and citizenship (Drake, Reid, and Kolohon, 2014) are listed. I believe these could be seamlessly interwoven with the essential question I offered: what does it mean to be alive? To be creative and innovative in building your identity, to think critically about the things you value most and the things you explore, to work collaboratively with others to promote peer growth and team-development, to communicate when you have questions or concerns, and to ensure you are proud of the character you develop, are all things one would need to “do” in order to answer this essential “know”-ing question.  

As we think about the “be” we can use the last 21st century skill to offer one summarizing statement: be a good citizen – respecting the construction of what it means to be alive made by those around you (in the classroom and outside of it). In my readings I have learned the “be” will change based on the values I feel are right or worth cultivating in my classroom, but thinking more about what Robinson said, I wonder if the “be” should be left for the children to decide, in their classroom. I think we need to offer a framework as educators for what to be, but that the details of this goal must be filled by the student’s themselves in order to take into consideration their stories, values, and opinions and in order to encourage the “do’s” listed above.

Source: http://www.myrkothum.com/
unique-personal-strength/
The ideas we have been discussing in class are undoubtedly beneficial. I sat here on a Saturday night watching videos about the new story, just because I was interested in it and wanted to learn more – the strategies our facilitator uses fosters my human desire to explore. I am not worried about grades, or memorizing content, all I’m focused on is learning, bettering me. But, I wonder if we could extend these ideas, these strategies, one benefit further… I think that if all of education could be framed in this respect, that an environment was created that was safe and inviting, and in which students felt comfortable exploring and learning on their own terms, that a more soulfully beneficial system would result. A “no-grades” basis, in which the value of a growth mindset was more important than the regurgitation of facts and concepts, would be more beneficial in creating strong people, instead of strong students.
  
References
Drake, S. M., Reid, J. L., and Kolohon, W. (2014). Interweaving curriculum and classroom assessment: Engaging the 21st-century learner. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, S. K. [dalailamacenter]. (2011, November 2). Sir Ken Robinson - Educating the Heart and Mind [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1A4OGiVK30